home
Systems
Validity and reliability of the dissertation provisions. Reliability of scientific statements Methods for confirming reliability

Validity and reliability of the dissertation provisions. Reliability of scientific statements Methods for confirming reliability

As noted above, in the “Regulations on the procedure for awarding...” the argumentation of the dissertation's provisions and conclusions is highlighted as a necessary feature of dissertation research. In addition, the point about the validity of these provisions, as a rule, is highlighted in the dissertation abstract and is mandatory. integral part in the conclusion of the Dissertation Council, which is sent to the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation.

Let us remind you what is meant by the mentioned terms, which have much in common. Under o reason is understood- presenting convincing arguments or arguments on the basis of which any statement or concept should be accepted. The requirement for the validity of acquired knowledge is usually called the principle of sufficient reason, which was first formulated by the famous German scientist G. Leibniz: “Everything that exists has sufficient reasons for its existence.” No phenomenon can be considered valid, no statement true or fair without indicating its basis. Reliability means confirmation, justification of the proposed position by some in a reliable way: theoretical methods, logical proof, empirical confirmation, experimental data, social practice.

Applying these concepts to dissertation research, we can point to the following evidence of the validity and reliability of its provisions and conclusions:

Using in the dissertation the works of leading domestic and foreign scientists on the topic of the dissertation.....;

Wide information base, which includes state statistics data, regulations, materials collected and processed by the author based on primary sources of information…….;

Correct use of scientific methodology, in particular, methods such as....;

Publication of the main provisions of the work and their testing... (at scientific and practical conferences, in practical activities....., in educational activities, etc., which is confirmed by documents on implementation).

Each of these points is one of the arguments in determining the reliability and validity of the dissertation provisions, however, they all need to be deciphered and clarified.

The first argument most often refers to the use in the work of the works of leading experts on the problem under study, a list of which is given in the introduction to the dissertation and in the abstract. This is completely justified, since it shows that the author bases his position not on empty ground, but on the solid foundation of previous researchers. But this is in theory. In practice, very often this list turns out to consist mainly of members of the dissertation council, scientific advisor, opponents, authors of recently read or seen monographs and articles. ...It is quite possible that all these people are indeed leading experts in the field of the dissertation research topic, but, firstly, obviously, the list of specialists is not limited to them, and, secondly, if any author is included in this list , then it must be indicated what his contribution to the development of the problem is.



Turning to the analysis of literature in a significant part of recent dissertations, unfortunately, is only a “duty place”, reduced to its superficial review, and the selection of analyzed works occurs randomly, and not in a systematic manner.

The analysis of literature on the topic of the dissertation should be considered by the dissertation author as one of the main subjects of the work for a number of reasons. Firstly, it has independent significance, being one of the indicators of the author’s scientific qualifications. The selection of literature and the quality of its analysis already contains information that shows the attentive reader (reviewer, opponent) how deeply the author of the dissertation understands the topic, how much he is able to identify the main thing in the position of a particular author. The study and analysis of literature should begin with a retrospective study of fundamental classical works, which formulate the main approaches to the problem under study, gradually moving on to newer and more specific works. This will make it possible to identify the main directions of development of the theory and practice of the branch of knowledge being studied, its patterns, solved and unresolved problems, and to competently approach the analysis of modern publications.

It is important to note that each branch of knowledge, including each area of ​​economic research, has its own fundamental classical works, knowledge of which shows the level of scientific erudition of the author. Therefore, the dissertation should demonstrate knowledge of such works, an understanding of the authors’ contribution to the study of the problem, and their significance for subsequent research.

Secondly, the study of literature is a necessary foundation for one’s own research of the problem, showing which areas of research are more developed, which problems are not properly reflected in the literature and need further development. This reduces the time for the researcher to repeat the path already traversed by science; it is freed up to focus on truly unresolved questions, the answers to which provide the scientific novelty of the dissertation.

When analyzing literature, one cannot limit oneself to “catching” quotes that confirm the author’s position. It is necessary to carefully read the content of the original source, comprehend the author’s position, record it and, having expressed one’s attitude towards it (agreement, disagreement), formulate one’s position on this basis, i.e. based on literature analysis, gain new knowledge through reflection. When analyzing the literature on the topic of the dissertation, one cannot limit oneself to one or two authors; it is necessary to analyze, if possible, all the most significant works, which allows one to identify commonalities and differences in the positions of the authors, and to understand their arguments in favor of one or another point of view. All this will make your own research more meaningful and effective.

The competent use of scientific methodology is important for substantiating the positions put forward by the author.

As you know, methodology is a complex of interrelated methods (i.e. techniques, methods, approaches) and principles with the help of which the process of studying the subject of a given science is carried out.

A method in science, in scientific activity, is a means (technique) by which new knowledge is obtained or systematization, evaluation, and generalization of existing information are carried out. Thus, the method of science determines how its subject is studied and is a way of understanding the surrounding reality.

Let us recall, in this regard, some methods that were not mentioned above. Firstly, all scientific methods are usually divided into general scientific and special.

General scientific methods include those that are used in all areas of scientific knowledge. These include, for example, the system-structural method, the functional approach, general logical techniques, etc.

The system-structural method involves research internal structure(structure) of the phenomenon being studied, as well as the study of connections both between the components within the phenomenon itself and with related phenomena and institutions. This method is based on the fact that: 1) the system is an integral complex of interconnected elements; 2) it forms unity with the environment; 3) as a rule, any system under study is an element of a higher order system; 4) the elements of any system under study, in turn, usually act as systems of a lower order.

The functional method is used to highlight various systems constituent structural parts in terms of their focus, purpose, role, content of activity. The functional approach is often used to highlight the areas of activity of the state and its role as a regulator economic relations, formation of organizational structures at enterprises, etc.

The analogy method is based on the assumption that there are certain correspondences between different phenomena of the same order, so that, knowing the characteristics of one of them, one can judge the other with sufficient certainty.

Modeling method. This method involves creating ideal images that reflect the most essential properties of the phenomena and processes being studied, studying the created models, and then distributing the obtained information to phenomena that exist in the real world.

General logical techniques (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, hypothesis) are used to define scientific concepts, consistently argue theoretical positions, and eliminate inaccuracies and contradictions. At their core, these techniques are a kind of “tools” for fruitful scientific activity.

All of the listed methods of cognition are closely related to each other and are used by researchers in combination. Thus, analysis, i.e., dividing the whole into its component parts, makes it possible to identify the structure, the structure of the object being studied, for example, a market, an industry, an enterprise. In turn, synthesis involves the process of combining parts, properties, characteristics, and relationships identified through analysis into a single whole. Thus, analysis and synthesis are considered as primary and derivative knowledge and represent inextricably linked stages in the perception of scientific information.

Induction and deduction are also directly related to analysis and synthesis. In essence, induction is the process of transition of analytical knowledge into synthesized knowledge, since any generalizations can only claim truth when they are based on primary true data. Accordingly, deduction can be conditionally called “reverse synthesis”, since it involves isolating specific information from generalized information. In particular, knowledge general patterns, reflecting economic processes in general, it allows you to make proposals regarding the optimization of its individual components, for example, the labor market, the real estate market, etc.

Special methods are techniques and ways of knowing that are developed within separate scientific groups (for example, in the field of natural or social sciences). TO special methods can be classified as historical, logical, statistical, etc.

The historical research method is based on the study of the emergence, formation and development of objects in chronological order. Thanks to the use of the historical method, an in-depth understanding of the essence of the problem is achieved and it becomes possible to formulate more informed recommendations for a new object.

The logical research method is a method of reproducing a historically developing object as a result of a certain process during which the necessary conditions its further existence and development as a sustainable systemic entity. In other words, this method of theoretical reproduction of a historical object in all its essential properties, natural connections and relationships. In the logical study of an object, one is distracted from all historical accidents, individual facts, zigzags and even backward movements caused by certain events, preserving only what is essential, necessary and natural.

Under statistical method This is understood as a set of interrelated techniques for studying mass objects and phenomena in order to obtain quantitative characteristics and identify general patterns by eliminating the random features of individual individual observations. The main methods of statistical research include observations, groupings, calculation of general indicators, sampling method, analysis of time series, index method, correlation and regression analysis.

Transcript

1 REVIEWS from the official opponent, Doctor of Economics, Professor Elena Igorevna Artemova on the dissertation work of Angelika Rashitovna Baicherova on the topic “Economic efficiency of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex”, submitted for competition scientific degree candidate of economic sciences in the specialty economics and management of the national economy: economics, organization and management of enterprises, industries, complexes: agro-industrial complex and agriculture to the dissertation council D at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Stavropol State Agrarian University" Relevance of the topic of dissertation research The efficiency of the functioning of domestic livestock farming is largely determined the state of the veterinary service system, and animal diseases pose a serious threat not only to the development of the industry, but also to the health and well-being of society as a whole. Therefore, the need for integrated approaches to determining the goals and objectives, the effectiveness of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex, both taking into account the accumulated experience and in terms of directions for further development, is an important problem and is being discussed by researchers different countries. From the perspective ecosystem approaches and the intensifying processes of globalization, scientists consider the role of veterinary medicine in ensuring food security, preventing and combating diseases common to humans and animals, protecting environment. However, the departure from traditional views on the role and functions of veterinary medicine is associated with a number of problems. In particular, methodological approaches to assessing the results of veterinary care, including from the point of view of its economic efficiency. Methods for assessing the effectiveness of individual veterinary measures or systems for the prevention of specific diseases and treatment of animals have been sufficiently developed and are widely used in scientific research and in practice. To justify the choice of the most effective means for animal protection, various methods are used, from surveys and calculations of expected damage to the construction of economic and mathematical

2 2 models. However, assessing the effectiveness of veterinary services as an infrastructural subsystem of the territorial agricultural system, as well as the socio-economic system as a whole, has not received sufficient justification. This issue is especially important in the context of the currently implemented organizational and economic reform of the state veterinary service in Russia. Depending on how the results of the veterinary service are assessed, the directions and pace of its further reform will be determined, including taking into account its role in ensuring the health and well-being of society. Due to the above arguments, the relevance of the dissertation research by Baicherova A.R. no doubt. The importance of these problems, insufficient knowledge of certain theoretical and applied aspects in relation to modern conditions determined the logic of the work and the range of issues considered in it. The degree of validity of scientific positions, conclusions and recommendations In the presented work, the author used a fairly large amount of theoretical material and statistical data. The main provisions, recommendations and conclusions contained in the dissertation seem scientifically substantiated and reliable, which is confirmed by a deep analysis of a representative array of information using various methods: analytical, monographic, economic-statistical, canonical correlations, system analysis and synthesis, expert survey, abstract logical, comparative, graphic, calculation-constructive. The analysis was carried out on an extensive empirical and factual base, including indicators of the development of livestock farming and the functioning of the veterinary service of 26 municipal districts and 5 urban districts of the Stavropol Territory. The choice of the system of indicators that forms the basis for assessing the economic efficiency of the veterinary service of the Stavropol Territory is quite justified, and proposals for improving the organizational and economic foundations of its functioning can be used in any subject of the Russian Federation.

3 3 Reliability and novelty of scientific provisions, conclusions and recommendations Reliability of the conclusions and results of the dissertation work of Baicherova A.R. is ensured by a substantive analysis performed by the applicant, using a set of economic and statistical methods implemented with the help of modern computer technology and is beyond doubt, since the results obtained during the study are based on an in-depth theoretical study of the fundamentals of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex, identifying trends and substantiating the prospects for the development of veterinary services for farm animals in the Stavropol region. Scientific novelty is determined by the results obtained during the research process and consists in theoretical justification approaches and methodological developments in the field of assessing the economic efficiency of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure, as well as substantiating recommendations for improving the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure (p.6). The main elements of scientific novelty include the addition and systematization of theoretical ideas about the essence of veterinary services as an infrastructural component of the agro-industrial complex and the justification of restrictions in the development of market relations based on identifying signs of a natural monopoly from the point of view of public utility (c). The author has expanded the understanding of the effect of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure from the standpoint of achieving the strategic goal - ensuring veterinary well-being, manifested not only in terms of the internal result (reducing the incidence of disease in farm animals), but also in the external component, including reducing damage to the environment and public health (p. 54-56). The dissertation author substantiates proposals for improving the methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the functioning of veterinary infrastructure, making it possible to calculate the integrated coefficient of economic efficiency of ensuring veterinary well-being and develop a system of indicators to increase the motivation of veterinary station personnel in achieving strategic goals (c).

4 4 The author’s attempt to identify, through an expert survey, and systematize organizational and economic areas for improving the activities of the veterinary service (c) deserves approval. Proposed by A.R. Baicherova developments regarding the regulation of prices for veterinary services, the formation of a unified fund for the development of regional veterinary services and the improvement of the state task planning system are distinguished by novelty and originality (c). Compliance of the dissertation and abstract with the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission The dissertation and abstract comply with the requirements for their construction, structure and design, and meet the basic provisions of the Higher Attestation Commission. The study was carried out within the framework of the section “Economics, organization and management of enterprises, industries, complexes: agro-industrial complex and agriculture”, corresponds to paragraph “Efficiency of functioning of industries and enterprises of agro-industrial complex”, “ Government regulation agriculture and other branches of the agro-industrial complex" passports of specialties of the Higher Attestation Commission under the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. The abstract and published scientific works of the applicant fully reflect the main content of the dissertation. The main results of the dissertation research were presented at international, all-Russian and regional scientific and practical conferences. 12 scientific papers with a total volume of 12.47 pp were published on the topic of the dissertation, including 3 articles in publications from the list of Russian peer-reviewed scientific journals for publishing the main results of dissertations. Personal contribution of the applicant and representativeness of the empirical material The personal contribution of the dissertation candidate is ensured by the increase in scientific knowledge about the development of the veterinary infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex, as one of the most important tools for ensuring food security and well-being of the population. In theoretical terms, the author’s personal contribution lies in the development of the theoretical foundations for the formation of market relations in infrastructure sectors and the theory of efficiency in relation to veterinary infrastructure.

5 5 V methodologically approaches to assessing the economic efficiency of the functioning of veterinary service entities are substantiated, allowing one to judge the situation in the field of ensuring veterinary welfare. In practical terms, the study has been brought to specific recommendations that can be used by federal and regional executive authorities in the field of veterinary medicine to develop forms of effective influence on the development of veterinary services. The representativeness of the empirical material (6 years) characterizing the activities of the state veterinary service of the Stavropol Territory is also not satisfactory. Evaluation of the content of the dissertation and its completeness The dissertation and abstract were written in accordance with the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission and reflect the logic and completeness of the research. The work is presented on 171 pages of computer text and consists of an introduction, three chapters, conclusions and proposals, and a list of references (187 titles). The work contains 19 tables, 15 figures and 19 appendices. In the introduction, the relevance of the problem under study is substantiated, the goal and objectives of the work are formulated, and the scientific and practical significance of the research results is determined. The formulation of the purpose of the study determined the directions of scientific research, consisting in the study of theoretical approaches and accumulated methodological provisions for ensuring the veterinary well-being of the territory through the formation integrated system support of the state veterinary service at all levels of functioning. The achievement of this goal was facilitated by the solution of a number of problems, during which a well-founded scientific view was formed on the essential role of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure in ensuring veterinary well-being, the processes of deepening market transformations in the area under study, the justification of directions for improving the activities of the veterinary service and methods for assessing its effectiveness. In the first chapter " Theoretical basis economics of veterinary business and assessment of its effectiveness" generalizes theoretical principles, as well as

6 6 reflects the views of scientists on the essence of the economic aspects of veterinary business, and also examines the features of the functioning of veterinary services for farm animals, which allowed the author to clarify the concept of “veterinary infrastructure” and its specific features, including those of a natural monopoly nature. In addition, the author carried out their systematization, which made it possible to argue for directions for further transformation of veterinary science (c). The study of existing approaches to assessing the effectiveness of veterinary services enabled the author to expand the understanding of the effect of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure, highlighting its internal and external components (c). In the second chapter " Current state veterinary services in the Stavropol Territory" carried out an analysis of the development of livestock farming in the region in comparison with all-Russian trends, as well as in the context of administrative regions (p. 68-72). Also given by the author detailed characteristics functioning of the regional veterinary service (c), the effectiveness of its activities was assessed using the existing methodology, the results of which made it possible to clarify the directions for improving the existing methodological approaches (c). In the third chapter, “Substantiation of directions for increasing the efficiency of functioning of the veterinary infrastructure of the agro-industrial complex,” Baicherova A.R. an improved methodology has been proposed for a comprehensive assessment of the functioning of the veterinary infrastructure, using in the calculations the assessment of the internal efficiency of animal morbidity and mortality indicators as the main indicators of the effectiveness of the veterinary service, and when assessing the external efficiency of the veterinary service, it is recommended to use indicators of the economic efficiency of veterinary activities manifested in related industries (environmental protection and health care) (c). Of undoubted interest are the author’s proposals for constructing a system of balanced indicators for the regional veterinary SBBI of the Grachevsky district, which can also be applied in other territorial units of the veterinary service, taking into account the specifics of veterinary activities in a given territory (c). Based on an expert survey of heads of veterinary

7 7 institutions of all territorial divisions of the Veterinary Administration of the Stavropol Territory, the author systematized the organizational and economic directions for improving veterinary services, taking into account the priority for certain groups of its subjects (c). Taking into account the analysis of the reform of the state veterinary service, Baicherova A.R. developed guidelines on regulating prices for paid veterinary services provided to the population (c) and determining contributions to the unified fund for the development of regional veterinary services (c). To solve the problem in the field of improving the economic conditions for the functioning of regional SBBBZ, the author proposed measures to improve the planning system and increase the objectivity of assessing the implementation of the state task (c). The dissertation concludes with a brief conclusion, including the main conclusions and sound recommendations that have scientific and practical value. In general, the presented work indicates the high qualifications of the applicant as a researcher. The work is well designed, fully equipped with graphic material, presented to the point, logically consistent, and competently. However, along with the stated advantages of the presented dissertation, there are shortcomings and omissions: 1. The conclusion about a favorable veterinary situation in the Stavropol Territory (p. 84) does not correlate with the concept of veterinary well-being, described by the author in section 1.3 (c) and information about the long-term persistence the threat of outbreaks of African swine fever (p. 80). 2. The formula proposed by the author for calculating the integral coefficient of economic efficiency of ensuring veterinary well-being (c) does not find practical use in the work. 3. Section 3.3 proposes standards for contributions to the unified fund for the development of the regional veterinary service, but does not consider the organizational and legal issues of its formation and the procedure for use. 4. Improving the veterinary care system


To the dissertation council D 212.001.06 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Adygei" State University» 385000, Maykop, st. Pervomaiskaya, 208 REVIEW from the official opponent, Doctor of Economics, Professor

To the dissertation council D 520.029.01 at the Institute for the Study of Goods Distribution and Wholesale Market Conditions Review of the official opponent of the Doctor of Economics, Professor for the dissertation work

Growth in agriculture and food industry. This is mainly due to the Food Security Doctrine adopted in 2010 and, in particular, to the implementation of the program “Development of the beet sugar industry.”

REVIEW from the official opponent on Denis Gennadievich Bond’s dissertation on the topic: “Development of local food markets in the Amur region”, submitted for the academic degree of candidate of economics

To the Dissertation Council D 212.039.04 at the FSBEI HPE "East Siberian State University of Technology and Management" REVIEW from the official opponent of the candidate of economic sciences, FSBEI HPE "Irkutsk

FSBEI HPE "BURYAT STATE UNIVERSITY" REVIEW from the official opponent on the dissertation work of Valery Aleksandrovich Tyumantsev "Improving the mechanism strategic planning development

To the dissertation council D 212.038.15 at Voronezh State University REVIEW from the official opponent of Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Victoria Markovna Kruglyakoeya on Chudinoya’s dissertation

REVIEW from the official opponent of Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Sergei Nikolaevich Yashin, on the dissertation of Evgeniy Nikolaevich Skvortsov on the topic “Formation organizational structure industrial management

To the dissertation council D220.010.02 at the Voronezh State Agrarian University named after Emperor Peter I FEEDBACK from the official opponent of Doctor of Economic Sciences Olga Gensanovna Charykova

REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONITOR, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Seliverstov Yuri Ivanovich on the dissertation of Marina Viktorovna Goldobina on the topic: “Formation and development of the mechanism for integrating higher education

Feedback from the official opponent, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor Irina Yuryevna Chazova on the dissertation work of Victoria Vasilievna Petukhova on the topic: “Formation of a cost management mechanism in

To the dissertation council D 212.287.01 for economic sciences at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Ural State Economic University" REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONITOR on the dissertation work of Izhguzina Nazlygul

To the dissertation council D 220.010.02 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education vocational education"Voronezh State Agrarian University named after the Emperor

Feedback from the official opponent on the dissertation research of Oksana Viktorovna Efremova on the topic “Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the formation of a teaching team in professional educational

To the dissertation council D 212.174.04 at the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution higher education"Novosibirsk National Research State University"

I OPPONITOR'S REVIEW on Ekaterina Nikolaevna Novikova's dissertation on the topic: “Development of the infrastructure for commercialization of the results of innovative activity,” submitted for the candidate’s academic degree

To the dissertation council D 212.298.15, created on the basis of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "South Ural State University" (national research university) REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONENT on the dissertation

Feedback from the official opponent on the dissertation of Alexander Valerievich Ksenofontov on the topic: “A mechanism for increasing the efficiency of quality management of hotel services based on improving professionalism

To the dissertation council D220.056.04 REVIEW from the official opponent of the candidate of economic sciences, associate professor Lidia Alekseevna Golovina on the dissertation work of Mikhail Sergeevich Efremov on the topic: “Providing

Feedback from the official opponent on the dissertation work of Alexey Igorevich Malyshev on the topic: “Sustainable development of social infrastructure in rural areas based on public-private partnership

2. Assessment of the structure and content of the work. The dissertation consists of an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion, a bibliography (157 names of sources, which are given the correct information in the text of the dissertation).

To the Dissertation Council D 002.009.01 at the Federal State budgetary institution Science Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, located at the address: 117218, Moscow, Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 32 OFFICIAL REVIEW

To the joint dissertation council D 999.031.03 on the basis of the Tajik State University of Commerce, Tajik national university, Russian-Tajik (Slavic) University REVIEW

Feedback from the official opponent, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Olga Anatolyevna Kozlova, on the dissertation of Larisa Nikolaevna Chudinova on the topic “Formation and evaluation of the investment support system

To the dissertation council D 212.049.03 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "State University of Management" APPROVED BY "Ulyanovsk University", Rheumatic Sciences, B.M. Kosgishko 2016 REVIEWS IN THE LEADING ORGANIZATION

To the dissertation council D.212.001.06 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Adyghe State University" 385000, Maikop, st. Pervomaiskaya, 208 REVIEW from the official opponent of Candidate of Economic Sciences Svetlana Musienko

To the dissertation council D 212.101.05 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Kuban State University" REVIEW from the official opponent - Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Elena Alekseevna Ermakova - on the dissertation

To the dissertation council D 004.022.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Economics Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FGBI IE Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) REVIEW from the official opponent of the Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor Uskova

Feedback from the official opponent on the dissertation of Nabieva Davlatbakht Madzhidovna “State regulation of the labor market and employment of the rural population in the conditions of market economy(based on materials from the Republic

REVIEW from the official opponent on the dissertation of Elena Grigorievna Spodareva on the topic: “Development of health insurance in the system of financing the state economy”, submitted for scientific research

REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONITOR, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor Lyudmila Leonidovna Suprunova about the dissertation of Zong Chengju “ Comparative analysis modernization of preschool education systems in Russia and

REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONITOR Associate Professor of the Faculty of Software Engineering and computer equipment St. Petersburg National Research University information technologies, mechanics and optics,

Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation Federal state budget educational institution higher education TOMSK STATE ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION UNIVERSITY"

1 review from the official opponent, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Natalya Nikolaevna Kunitsyna on the dissertation work of Artem Mikhailovich Shaposhnikov on the topic “Interbank competition and evaluation

To the Dissertation Council D 212.053.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Dagestan State University" REVIEW from the official opponent Fatimat Abdullakhovna Mambetova about the dissertation work of Milena Rasulovna Akhmedova,

To the dissertation council DM 220.048.05 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Novosibirsk State Agrarian University REVIEW

To the dissertation council D 212.122.01 at the Moscow State University of Technology and Management named after K.G. Razumovsky (First Cossack University)" REVIEW from the official opponent of the doctor

To the dissertation council D 220.061.02 on the basis of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saratov State Agrarian University named after N.I. Vavilov" REVIEW from the official opponent of Doctor of Economic Sciences Olga Nikolaevna Pronskaya

To the Dissertation Council D 504.001.09 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Russian Academy of National Economy and civil service under the President of the Russian Federation" REVIEW OF AN OFFICIAL OPPONITOR on Borisova's dissertation

APPROVED: Vice-Rector, for scientific and innovative work of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Nizhny Novgorod State Agricultural Academy of Agricultural Sciences,

APPROVED: Vice-Rector for scientific work i)thegical development of the North Caucasus State University of Geographical Sciences A. A. Likhovid 2016 Feedback from the leading organization of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "North Caucasus

To the dissertation council D 224.003.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute of TSS” REVIEW of the official opponent on the dissertation of Lyudmila Vladimirovna Kushnaryeva “DEVELOPMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR AN INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE

Review of the dissertation of Pavel Mikhailovich Oleynik on the topic: “The powers of the head of the investigative body to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of the accused,” submitted for an academic degree

Feedback from the OFFICIAL OPPONITOR, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Vice-Rector for Integration with Production and additional education, Head of the Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship in Construction

FSBI "INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS AND ORGANIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION SB RAS" REVIEW OF THE OFFICIAL OPPONITOR Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Evgenia Anatolyevna Kolomak on Mityukhin's dissertation work

Development of effective financial and economic standards for the activities of Russian commercial banks and ensuring their innovative unity with the international banking system. These trends have

To the joint dissertation council D 999.031.03 on the basis of the Tajik State University of Commerce, Tajik National University, Russian - Tajik (Slavic) University

To the dissertation council D 212.261.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin" REVIEW from the official opponent, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor Natalya Aleksandrovna Muravyeva

To the dissertation council D 212.209.02 at the Rostov State Economic University (RINH) Feedback from the official opponent, Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor Maya Anatolyevna Azarskaya

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION "LIPETSK STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY" (LSTU) RECTOR Moskovskaya st.,

To the dissertation council D 212.261.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin" REVIEW from the official opponent - Candidate of Economic Sciences, general director OOO

I APPROVED the state institution "Michurinsky Agrarian University", a. Babushkin April 25, 2017 REVIEW OF THE LEADING ORGANIZATION OF THE Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution

Feedback from the official opponent on the dissertation of Kylchykbaev Tilek Emilbaevich on the topic: “Legal regime of agricultural lands in the Kyrgyz Republic”, specialty: 12.00.06 - natural resources

To the dissertation council D 212.002.06 REVIEW from the official opponent on the dissertation work of Yuri Viktorovich Savin on the topic: “Methodological support for the formation of the organizational structure of an innovation-active

Feedback from 1 official opponent of Doctor of Architecture, Professor Yulia Sergeevna Yankovskaya on the dissertation work of Alexandra Fedorovna Perova on the topic: “Architectural typology of business tourism centers

REVIEW from the official opponent, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor Tamara Sergeevna Serova about the dissertation of Irina Vladilenovna Telezhko “An integrative model for the formation of sociocultural competence of a translator

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "ST. PETERSBURG STATE ECONOMIC UNIVERSITY" (SPbGEU) Sadovaya st., 21, St. Petersburg,

The main part of all sections of the introduction in any scientific work is the validity and reliability of both existing scientific provisions and results, and those obtained as a result of the work done.

In this section, the applicant for a scientific degree must convincingly prove and provide scientific basis for conclusions and recommendations that the latter are not the result of false conclusions.

In order for the academic council to be able to verify the truth and appropriateness of the research conducted and the results obtained within the framework of a particular dissertation work, it is necessary that the results be accurately confirmed on all types and classes of the subject of research on the scale of a specific object.

Under similar or not very different initial conditions at the objects, approximately the same results could be obtained again.

How is the reliability of scientific statements proven?

There are different ways to confirm or deny the truth.

  • First, there must be reliable initial information about the subject of research.

This is proven by analyzing similar works on the same or extremely similar problem written before.

  • The second is the use in research of previously tested appropriate scientific and methodological apparatus.
  • Third. Confirmation by verification means carrying out similar work on several research objects, resulting in similar results.

Validation Methods

Also, the following methods of confirming reliability are quite common: analytics, scientific experiments and direct practice.

  • Analytics. Its use is possible provided that a mathematical apparatus is used to create models, i.e. describe the ongoing process in numerical terms.
  • Experimental method. The results obtained are compared: theoretical and practical. And based on this, appropriate conclusions are drawn.

Subject to confirmation (truth) of scientific results, the percentage of coincidences of phenomena with the initially constructed theory is considered.

  • In addition, confirmation of reliability occurs by comparing the availability, quality and quantity of the material being studied and the experimental implementation of the results obtained in practical application.

Examples of presentation of the reliability of the scientific provisions of the dissertation

The reliability of the scientific provisions of the dissertation in the specialty 03.02.08 “Ecology”:


Feedback from an official opponent on the dissertation

___________________________________
Full Name
_________________________________________________________________________
title of dissertation
for the academic degree of candidate (doctor) of technical sciences in specialty(s) ________________________________________________________________
code and name of the specialty in accordance with the nomenclature of scientific specialties

Relevance of the topic

The relevance of the topic chosen by the dissertation author is beyond doubt. The subject of the dissertation research, in my opinion, is... Questions... remain difficult to research, because... Currently, there is a well-known contradiction between... This gives grounds to assert that the scientific problem formulated in the dissertation... .. is current. The solution to this problem will allow (implications for the branch(es) of science) ...

Degree of validity of scientific statements, conclusions and recommendations

(assessment of the validity of the results in the dissertation by the author from the opponent’s point of view)

The author quite correctly uses well-known scientific methods to substantiate the results, conclusions and recommendations obtained. The author has studied and critically analyzed the well-known achievements and theoretical positions of other authors... ... on issues... The list of used literature contains... titles.
For analysis... the author creates a methodology (model)... that allows us to identify patterns...
The author finds an explanation for the fact..., with which one can agree, however, it is known from the works... that...
To confirm the theoretical provisions, the author conducts experimental studies, the purpose of which is to establish a connection between...
Similar results were obtained experimentally in the works..., but the conditions for obtaining them did not take into account the influence of factors... Taking these factors into account explains the discrepancies in the values...
The validity of the results put forward by the applicant is based on the consistency of experimental data and scientific conclusions. Thus, it was experimentally established that... A similar result was obtained when calculating the values...
The reliability of experimental data is ensured by using modern means and research methods. The provisions of the theory are based on well-known achievements of fundamental and applied scientific disciplines... mathematics and mathematical statistics,... In the work, the dissertation candidate competently uses mathematical apparatus..., correctly introduces new concepts...

Assessment of novelty and reliability

(opponent’s assessment of the novelty and reliability of the results)

The dissertation author put forward the following as new scientific results...:
In general, the results obtained by the author represent new scientific knowledge... in the branch (junction of branches) of knowledge. However, in my opinion, the applicant’s conclusion about... This, in particular, is evidenced by the following fact...
Also, it is premature to talk about the sufficient validity of the position indicating... Similar results were obtained in studies..., however, they showed that...
The results presented for defense are consistent (not consistent) with the data obtained... The well-known model obtained... allows one to obtain the results..., but without taking into account...
The reliability of the theoretical results of the work is confirmed by experimental data presented in well-known works...
The main results of the dissertation were published in... printed works, they were repeatedly discussed at various conferences and symposiums and received the approval of leading experts.
The reliability..., in particular, is evidenced by the examination of data carried out...

Comments on the dissertation work as a whole

1. The research did not reflect the question... .
2. The conclusion about... is questionable.
3. There is an inaccurate statement of the following points... .
4. Some results are descriptive in nature (p. ...) and can be shortened without much damage.
The noted shortcomings reduce the quality of the research, but they do not affect the main theoretical and practical results of the dissertation.

Conclusion

The dissertation is a completed research work completed by the author independently at a high scientific level. The work presents scientific results that allow them to be qualified as... (one of the points of the attribute that determines the nature of the dissertation results). The results obtained by the author are reliable, the conclusions and conclusions are justified.
The work is based on a sufficient number of initial data, examples and calculations. It is written clearly, competently and neatly presented. Clear conclusions are drawn for each chapter and the work as a whole.
The abstract corresponds to the main content of the dissertation.
The dissertation work meets the requirements of the Regulations for the Award of Academic Degrees", and its author (Last Name First Name Patronymic) deserves to be awarded the academic degree of candidate (doctor) ... of science in the specialty(s) ...

Official opponent _______________________
I certify the signature of the official opponent:
Academic Secretary of the University ___________
Official seal
date

Sections