Calculation of an automatic fire extinguishing installation in a room
VI. MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN DECISIONS WHEN ACCEPTING ASPS AND ASPS FOR OPERATION
22. Acceptance of ASPT and ASPS into operation must be carried out by a working commission appointed by order of the head of the customer enterprise (organization).
23. The working commission includes a representative of the customer (chairman of the commission), the general contractor, the design, installation and commissioning organization, as well as the organization carrying out maintenance and repair, and a representative of the State Fire Control bodies.
Participation of representatives of State Fire Control bodies in state and departmental acceptance commissions is mandatory. In addition to the official representative of the state fire safety authorities, employees of the state fire supervision who exercise control during the construction and further operation of the facility may be involved in participation in the work of the commissions (clause 2, NPB 05-93).
24. The work of the commission is carried out according to the acceptance testing program agreed with the territorial body of the State Border Service and approved by the customer.
The acceptance test program should include:
25. When putting the ASPT into operation, the installation and commissioning organizations must submit:
26. The working commission must:
27. If the working commission discovers that the installation and commissioning work performed does not comply with the project and requirements regulatory documentation a protocol is drawn up indicating the identified deficiencies and the time frame for their elimination, as well as the organizations responsible for this.
After eliminating the shortcomings specified in the protocol, the installation and commissioning organization must again present the installation for delivery.
28. The commissioning of an automatic fire extinguishing installation must be documented in a document (Appendix 29).
29. A representative of the GPN body who is a member of the commission is obliged to:
If violations of requirements are detected regulatory documents, design decisions and activities, a representative of the State Fire Control body expresses a special opinion in writing to the chairman of the commission, and the acceptance committee’s act is not signed.
30. The local State Fire Service body must keep a log that takes into account the main characteristics of automated fire alarm systems accepted for operation, their operation and failures.
31. Features of monitoring norms, rules and safety requirements when accepting water and foam fire extinguishing installations into operation
31.1. Acceptance into operation of water and foam fire extinguishing installations must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of GOST R 50680-94 "Automatic water fire extinguishing installations. General technical requirements. Test methods" and GOST R 50800-95 "Automatic foam fire extinguishing installations. General technical requirements. Test methods".
31.2. When putting the installation into operation, the installation and commissioning organization must present:
31.3. When accepting the installation into operation, the following must be carried out:
31.4. The need to conduct fire tests, check the intensity of irrigation of the protected area and the specified response time of the installation is determined by the customer, state supervision authorities or the acceptance committee.
Fire tests should be carried out according to the program and methodology approved in in the prescribed manner and agreed with the state supervision authorities.
31.5. External inspection establishes:
31.6. Before testing control units, all elements and units of the installation, containers to be filled with water must be filled with it. The automatic water feeder, filled with the calculated amount of water, must be pumped with air to the operating pressure specified in the project.
Filling the installation with water is carried out in the following order:
31.7. Testing the correct operation of the control units of sprinkler installations should be carried out by opening the tap (valve) on the drain pipe designed to check the operation of the installation, in this case the valve should open and the alarm device should operate (automatic start of the pumps is possible).
Tests of the correct operation of the control units of deluge installations should be carried out with the valve installed above the valve closed, by opening the tap (valve) on the stimulating pipeline, in this case the valve should open and the alarm device should operate.
31.8. Pressure containers must be registered and tested in accordance with the requirements of the "Rules for Construction and safe operation pressure vessels."
31.9. Hydraulic tests of containers operating without pressure must be carried out in compliance with the following requirements:
At the first stage, the container must be filled to a height of one meter and kept for 24 hours to check the tightness of the bottom.
At the second stage, the container must be filled to the design level.
The container is considered to have passed the test if no signs of leakage are detected within 24 hours.
31.10. Pipelines must be tested in accordance with the requirements of SNiP 3.05.05 " Technological equipment and process pipelines."
31.11. Testing of pumps and compressors should be carried out in accordance with VSN 394 “Installation instructions for compressors and pumps”.
31.12. Functionality check pulse device is carried out by simulating, using the ECM arrow, a pressure drop in it by 0.05 MPa. In this case, the light and sound alarms should turn on on the alarm panel in the fire post (control room).
31.13. The quality of the foam concentrate or its solution should be checked in accordance with GOST R 50588-93 "Foam concentrates for extinguishing fires. General technical requirements and test methods."
32. Features of monitoring norms, rules and safety requirements when accepting gas fire extinguishing installations into operation
32.1 The test procedure for acceptance into operation of the UGP must comply with GOST R 50969-96.
32.2. Testing of installations to check the response time, duration of GOS supply and fire extinguishing concentration of GOS in the volume of the protected premises (clauses 4.9-4.11 GOST R 50969-96) are not mandatory. The need for their experimental verification is determined by the customer or, in case of deviation from design standards affecting the parameters being tested, officials management bodies and divisions of the State Fire Service in the implementation of state fire supervision.
33. Features of monitoring norms, rules and safety requirements when accepting aerosol fire extinguishing installations into operation
33.1. When accepting aerosol fire extinguishing installations into operation, it is necessary to be guided by NPB 21-98 and NPB 22-96.
33.2. Before putting into operation during a comprehensive inspection, the UAP must be run-in for at least one month. During this period it should be in manual start mode. All cases of false alarms of the system fire alarm and control over the automatic launch of the UAP must be recorded by an automatic device or in a special logbook by on-duty personnel (with a 24-hour presence at the site), followed by an analysis of their causes.
If there are no false alarms or other functional violations of the UAP during the specified period of time, the installation is transferred to the automatic operating mode.
If during the running-in period of the UAP the specified functional disturbances (failures) occurred, their causes were not clarified and eliminated, the UAP is subject to re-regulation and comprehensive testing, including repeated running-in.
Testing the performance of the UAP during a comprehensive check should be carried out by measuring signals taken from control points of the main functional units of detectors and secondary devices according to the diagrams given in the TD.
In this case, GOA simulators can be used as a load on the launch line, electrical characteristics which must comply with the characteristics of the GOA launch devices.
33.3. The commissioning of the installed UAP must be carried out based on the results of a comprehensive check and run-in, and a conclusion (act) of the commission must be drawn up, determining the technical condition, operability and possibility of commissioning the UAP.
The commission for acceptance into operation of the UAP should include representatives of the administration of the facility, territorial (local) authorities of the State Fire Service, organizations that carried out the design, installation and comprehensive inspection of the installation.
34. Features of monitoring norms, rules and safety requirements when accepting automatic powder fire extinguishing installations into operation
34.1. Acceptance into operation of the MAUPT without carrying out a comprehensive commissioning (comprehensive testing) is not allowed. Testing the performance of the MAUPT during a comprehensive check should be carried out by measuring signals taken from the control points of the main functional units and secondary devices of the MAUPT according to the diagrams given in the TD. In this case, simulators can be used as a load on the starting line, the electrical characteristics of which must correspond to the characteristics of the starting devices of the modules as part of the MAUPT.
34.2. When accepting the completed installation and commissioning work of the MAUPT, the commission carries out:
34.3. During an external inspection, check:
34.4. Test methods for measuring insulation resistance and alarm loop, operability of mounted installations, voltage and current control of MAUPT starting devices are determined in each specific case by the working commission.
34.5. If individual inconsistencies in the work performed are detected with the design documentation or the inspection report, the commission must draw up a report on the identified deviations, indicating the organizations responsible for their elimination. These organizations must eliminate the inconsistencies within 10 days, and the installation organizations must re-submit the MAUPT for delivery.
34.6. MAUPT is considered accepted for operation if inspection (testing) establishes:
34.7. Acceptance of MAUPT must be documented in an act in accordance with Appendix 29.
34.8. The need to connect MAUPT to central monitoring consoles (CNC) is determined by departments private security with the participation of representatives of the customer and state fire control authorities.
34.9. Upon completion of installation, MAUPT reception and control devices must have a sign containing:
34.10. Upon completion of delivery and acceptance into operation of the MAUPT, the installation and commissioning organization must seal those parts of the devices to which its representative had access during the installation, adjustment and adjustment of the installation, and check for the presence of manufacturer’s seals on the devices.
35. Features of acceptance into operation of fire alarm systems and automatic fire extinguishing installations
35.1. The documentation presented upon acceptance for commissioning of fire alarm systems and automatic fire extinguishing installations must comply with Appendix 30.
35.2. Acceptance into operation of ASPS and AUP without carrying out comprehensive adjustment and testing is not allowed.
35.3. When accepting into operation the completed work on installation and commissioning of ASPS and AUP, the working commission carries out:
IN necessary cases the commission also carries out other checks of the parameters agreed upon technical specifications to the equipment.
35.4. Acceptance test procedure technical means signaling into operation is determined in each specific case by the working commission.
35.5. If any discrepancies are detected between the work performed and the design documentation or inspection report, as well as the requirements of these rules, the commission must draw up a report on the identified deviations (Appendix 31), on the basis of which the installation and commissioning organization must eliminate them within the agreed period and re-present the technical signaling equipment for delivery.
35.6. ASPS and AUP are considered accepted for operation if the inspection establishes the following:
35.7. Registration of acceptance results: